Study Shows Over 40 White House Officials Hold Direct Ties to Coal Companies
Based on a new analysis, scores of personnel with histories in the fossil fuel sector have been positioned within the present government, including above 40 who formerly worked directly for oil firms.
Context of the Analysis
The report examined the backgrounds of nominees and personnel positioned in the administration and eight national offices overseeing energy policy. Those encompass important bodies like the EPA, the interior agency, and the energy office.
Broader Regulatory Climate
The review emerges while ongoing efforts to dismantle climate policies and clean energy programs. For example, latest acts have opened vast sections of federal land for mining and phased out funding for clean energy.
Amid the barrage of terrible actions that have transpired on the climate front... it’s vital to remind the people that these aren’t just actions from the vague, huge thing that is the leadership generally, commented a analyst involved in the study. They are commonly specific players coming from certain wealthy interests that are carrying out this harmful anti-regulatory program.
Significant Discoveries
Authors identified 111 employees whom they considered as energy sector veterans and clean energy critics. This covers 43 individuals who were directly employed by coal companies. Among them are well-known top executives like the energy secretary, who previously worked as top executive of a fracking corporation.
This group additionally includes less prominent government staff. For example, the division responsible for energy efficiency is led by a former gas leader. In the same vein, a top energy advisor in the administration has occupied high-ranking positions at major energy companies.
Further Connections
A further 12 officials were found to have ties to energy-financed conservative research groups. Those encompass previous members and associates of organizations that have actively opposed alternative sources and advocated the continuation of conventional sources.
A total of 29 other appointees are previous corporate executives from manufacturing industries whose activities are intimately tied to fossil fuels. Additional officials have relationships with energy providers that sell conventional power or elected representatives who have pushed pro-oil policies.
Departmental Focus
Investigators found that 32 personnel at the Department of the Interior alone have connections to extractive industries, making it the most influenced national body. That encompasses the leader of the department, who has consistently accepted oil support and served as a conduit between fossil fuel industry contributors and the government.
Political Contributions
Oil and gas donors contributed substantial resources to the election operation and swearing-in. After entering the White House, the leadership has not only implemented energy-sector regulations but also created tax breaks and exemptions that advantage the sector.
Expertise Concerns
In addition to oil-tied nominees, the researchers found multiple government officials who were nominated to influential jobs with little or no pertinent knowledge.
These people may not be linked to the energy sector so explicitly, but their inexperience is dangerous, said one co-author. It is reasonable to think they will be pushovers, or easy marks, for the oil industry’s objectives.
For instance, the nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency’s department of chief legal officer has very little legal history, having not ever tried a case to completion, never conducted a deposition, and nor filed a court petition.
In another instance, a executive assistant dealing on energy matters arrived to the position after being employed in positions separate to the industry, with no apparent direct sector or regulatory experience.
White House Response
One spokesperson for the executive branch dismissed the analysis, commenting that the administration’s appointees are extremely capable to deliver on the public’s instruction to expand domestic fuel production.
Previous and Current Context
The leadership oversaw a massive array of pro-industry steps during its previous term. During its second period, prepared with pro-business plans, it has initiated a far more extensive and stricter crackdown on climate rules and renewable energy.
There is no hesitation, stated one expert. They are proud and prepared to go out there and promote the fact that they are doing benefits for the fossil fuel sector, extractive sector, the coal business.